Statement of Relief Pages in Petition to the Supreme Court of Our United States of America

Statement of Relief Pages In Petition to the

Supreme Court of Our United States of America

- Part Two -

By Luis Angel Perez, writing4light

October 05, 2018

Statement of Relief in petition to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)

for a redress of grievances pertaining to Local, State, & Federal Government’s attack on

poor, low-income & people of color in our Public School System, Communities, & Families.

Perez, L.A. Relief Statement, Luis Angel Perez v. New York Department of Education,

March 07, 2018, two pages of last writ packet submitted to SCOTUS,

&

Proof of Service United States Postal Service Receipts, March 08, 2018, one page.

First Two Pages of My Last Petition

First Two Pages of My Petition to the

Supreme Court of Our United States of America

- Part One -

By Luis Angel Perez, writing4light

October 03, 2018

Below you can find only some of the important contemporaneous documents & information already in Court evidence.

Specifically, the first two pages of my petition to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) demanding a redress of grievances pertaining to Local, State, & Federal Government’s attack on poor, low-income & people of color

in our Public School System, Communities, & Families.

Perez, L.A. PLEASE NOTE, March 07, 2018, page one of last writ packet submitted to SCOTUS,

Perez, L.A. QUESTIONS PRESENTED, March 07, 2018, page two of last writ packet submitted to SCOTUS,

&

Proof of Service United States Postal Service Receipts, March 08, 2018, one page.

Baseline of Disregard: The Common-Core Discriminatory Weaponization

Baseline of Disregard:

The Common-Core Discriminatory Weaponization

of School Evaluations

- Part One -

By Luis Angel Perez, writing4light

October 03, 2018

Below you can find only some of the important contemporaneous documents & information already in Court evidence.

Perez, L.A. Baseline of Disregard, November 03, 2013, three pages

&

Perez, L.A. RE: Schedule Change for October 25^th 1^st & 6^th period Preps, October 25, 2013, one page. 

Gross Theft of Wages, Harassment, Abuse of Power Committed By Officers of Local & State Government Department of Education

Gross Theft of Wages, Harassment, Abuse of Power

Committed By Officers of Local & State Government Department of Education

By Luis Angel Perez, writing4light

September 07, 2018

(1) U.S. Postal Service Mail Date: August 08, 2018 (two pages; including the law firm’s initial correspondence).

Title: “Dear Attorney for The City of New York Mr. Paul R. Gross, New York City Public School Chancellor Richard A. Carranza, New York City Counsel Speaker Corey Johnson, & New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio,”

Below you will see only some of the important contemporaneous documents & information already in Court evidence.

(2) E-mail Date: January 20, 2015 (two pages)

Title: “I RECEIVED NO CHECK THIS PAY PERIOD” 

(3) E-mail Date: January 20, 2015 (one page)

Title: “PLEASE RESPOND WITH A SOLUTION” 

(4) E-mail Date: February 01, 2015 (four pages)

Title: “Salary Step Scam?”   

(5) E-mail Date: November 02, 2015 (two pages)

Title: “No Retroactive Pay and Bounced Check”  

Discrimination, Unfair Representation, Suppression of Critical Evidence, & Obstruction of Justice Committed By Officers of Local & State Teachers Labor Union

Discrimination, Unfair Representation,

Suppression of Critical Evidence, & Obstruction of Justice

Committed By Officers of Local & State Teachers Labor Union

By Luis Angel Perez, writing4light

September 07, 2018

Below you can find only some of the important contemporaneous documents & information already in Court evidence.

(1) Electronic Mail (E-mail) Dates: November 04 – November 20, 2014 (six pages).

Title: “Subject: Documents attached”

Slow-Walking the return of binders-worth of contemporaneous documents & information critical to an impartial, fair, & accurate defense against false allegations & abuse of power imposed upon especially poor, low-income Students, Families, & Educators of color by Officials working in our Public Schools.

Additionally, the Teachers Union’s so call “Political Action Team” refused to provide critical documents to the Union Lawyer initially assigned to represent me against the bogus New York State 3020a charges nefariously concocted by Officials working with our Public Schools.  

(2) E-mail Date: April 18, 2015 (six pages).

Title: “Subject: The Handling of the 3020a”

Conflict of Interest, Obstruction of Justice, Deceptive, Unfair, & Bias Legal Representation by the Teachers Union demonstrated even prior to the start of the New York State 3020a Investigation Hearings. Contemporaneous report written immediately after my initial conference with the then newly assigned Union Lawyer, [note: the previous Union Lawyer assigned to represent me was ABRUBTLY changed]. 

Dissent Against The Federal Supreme Court’s Decision To Deny Litigation

Dissent Against The Federal Supreme Court’s Decision To Deny Litigation