Objections
To
The
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
Of
Partially Granting
Defendant’s
Motion To Dismiss,
Grateful
For Recommendation
Of
Partially Denying
Defendant’s
Motion To Dismiss,
&
Some Important Corrections
By Luis Ángel Pérez, (writing4light)
Below that you will find Educator Mr.
Perez’s Objection to The Part of the Motion to Dismiss that the Magistrate Judge recommended be Granted as well as Educator Mr. Perez’s Expressed Gratitude to The Part of the Motion to Dismiss that the Magistrate Judge recommended be Denied, [Perez, Luis A. OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION
OF PARTIALLY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, GRATEFUL FOR
RECOMMENDATION OF PARTIALLY DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, & SOME
IMPORTANT CORRECTIONS, August 15, 2017, fourteen (14) pages].
Over two (2) years after Educator Mr.
Perez’s EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT against the New York City
Department of Education, DOE, (aka Board
of Education, BOE), was filed in the United States District Court Southern
District of New York, [Perez v New York
City Department of Education: Case No. 15–CV–7156 (LAP)(PAE)(KNF)], said
Court ruled in favor of the New York City Department of Education, (EMPLOYMENT
DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT “DISMISSED”,
September 15, 2017).
For the foregoing reasons, because the
DOE/BOE unfairly owes Educator Mr. Perez an excessive amount of money for time
already worked, because Educator Mr. Perez was unfairly pushed-out of the
DOE/BOE weeks prior to his ten (10) year employment anniversary which would
have secured his pension for his family, because of the rampant persecution
& intentional infliction of emotional & physical distress which has
directly resulted in the collapse of his health, because of the defamation to
his character, because of the baseless allegations which have effectively
tarnished his employment record, and because of the rampant disparate treatment
& discrimination which continues to plague in the New York City Public
School System, [for example Educator Mr.
Perez was employed for almost a decade in a NYC Public School named Amistad,
where Latino Students, Parents, & Educators are incredibly segregated from
their peers, (i.e. over 85% Latino Student Enrollment), & unfairly deprived
from fair essential resources & equal justice], and for other
previously mentioned important and relevant reasons –
Educator Mr. Perez Respectfully
Petitions the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit of New York
for a Redress of these Important Public Interest Grievances.
The District Court of the City of New
York had the jurisdiction, the power, and the grand opportunity to allow for
such serious public interest EMLOYMENT DISCIMINATION COMPLAINT to be fairly
litigated before the Court & a Jury &/or in some fashion help hold
Public School Officials accountable for violating Human & Constitutional
Rights.
Instead, the District Court opted to
reject such important public interest EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT and,
in such way, managed to project the District Court’s partiality in enforcing
The Rule of Humanity & The Rule of Law – for all humans.
“The True
Administration Of Justice
Is The Firmest Pillar
Of Good Government”
We hope and pray that the Honor of the
United States Court of Appeals For The Second Circuit of The City of New York
will, this time, truthfully administer justice and, in doing so, redeem such
eroded pillar to what has the potential to be an even greater government to ALL
of the humans of these United States of America.
Below that you will find Educator Mr.
Perez’s Objection to The Part of the Motion to Dismiss that the Magistrate Judge recommended be Granted as well as Educator Mr. Perez’s Expressed Gratitude to The Part of the Motion to Dismiss that the Magistrate Judge recommended be Denied, [Perez, Luis A. OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION
OF PARTIALLY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, GRATEFUL FOR
RECOMMENDATION OF PARTIALLY DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, & SOME
IMPORTANT CORRECTIONS, August 15, 2017, fourteen (14) pages].
